A new approach to control of voltage levels and reactive power compensation in 110—220 kV grids

  • Дмитрий [Dmitriy] Борисович [B.] Гвоздев [Gvozdev]
  • Станислав [Stanislav] Сергеевич [S.] Холопов [Kholopov]
Keywords: dispatch control personnel performance efficiency, centralized voltage control, volt/VAR optimization, reduction of active power losses

Abstract

Today, there are a lot of adjustable components in power grids, which include generators, synchronous and static reactive power compensators, static capacitor banks, transformers with longitudinal voltage control and with combined voltage magnitude and phase shift control, and shunt reactors. The difficulties of performing dispatch control of such a variety of controllable components, which are stemming from the complexity of calculating their optimal control modes, are further aggravated by the complexity and highly branched configurations of network circuits, a large number of operating parameters to be monitored, and the necessity of taking into account a random and indefinite composition and state of initial data. An excessive burden imposed on the dispatch control operators by the amount of incoming data and information links may adversely affect the reliability of power grid operation. In order to improve the power grid operational reliability, it is proposed to reduce the information burden imposed on the dispatch control operators by setting up automated control of voltage levels within the dispatch control center’s coverage area. The approach to solving the problem of setting up automated voltage control includes a few stages: studying the volt/VAR operating mode optimization methods, elaborating a voltage control algorithm based on the most efficient volt/VAR optimization approaches, and designing an automated voltage control system operating in accordance with the elaborated algorithm. The article presents the results from an analytic investigation of the matrix of voltage sensitivity coefficients carried out for the test 110—220 kV grid. The obtained results corroborated the hypothesis about the possibility of determining---based on the values of matrix elements---the grid nodes the control of voltage and reactive power at which has the most efficient influence on the active power losses in the test grid. An algorithm for centralized control of voltage levels and reactive power in 110—220 kV grids is proposed. The proposed algorithm can be used for setting up a centralized voltage control system that would make it possible to achieve better control of the power grid operating mode by increasing the number of voltage checkpoints in the grid and reduce the information burdens imposed on the dispatch control operators by automating the voltage control process.

Information about authors

Дмитрий [Dmitriy] Борисович [B.] Гвоздев [Gvozdev]

Science degree: Ph.D. (Techn.)
Workplace dept. of Electrical Power Systems NRU MPEI; situation and analytical center of «Russian network»
Occupation associate professor; director

Станислав [Stanislav] Сергеевич [S.] Холопов [Kholopov]

Workplace perspective development of services of JSC «System Operator of Unified Energy System»
Occupation specialist 2nd category

References

1. Гвоздев Д.Б. Разработка критерия оптимальной информационной нагрузки диспетчера ЦУС предприятия электрических сетей // Вестник МЭИ. 2013. № 2.C. 52—55.
2. Гвоздев Д.Б. Информационная оценка системы диспетчерского управления // Электрические cтанции.2006. № 3. C. 47—51.
3. Amgad A. e. a. Optimum VAR sizing and allocation using particle swarm optimisation // Electric Power System Research. 2008. V. 77. N 8. P. 965—972.
4. Tao Y., Meliopoulous A.P.S. Optimal Power Flow via Quadratic Power Flow. // IEEE Power Systems Conf. and Exposition. Phoenix, 2011.
5. Schecter A. Exploration of the AC Optimal Power Flow Feasible Region for the Standard // IEEE Test Set. FERC Technical conf. to discuss opportunities for increasing real-time and day-ahead market efficiency through improved software. Docket N AD12-12-003, December, 2012.
6. Jiang Q.Y. e. a. Power-current hybrid rectangular formulation for interior-point optimal power flow //Institute of Eng. and Tech. (IET) Generation. Trans. and Distrib. 2009. V. 3. Iss. 8. P. 748—756.
7. Glavitsch H., Bacher R. Optimal Power Flow Algorithms. Zurich (Switzerland): Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.
8. Da Costa V.M., Rosa A.L.S. A Comparative Analysis of Different Power Flow Methodologies // IEEE Transmission & Distribution Conf. and Exposition: Latin America. Bogota, 2008.
9. Cain M.B., O’Neill R.P. Castillo A. History of Optimal Power Flow and Formulations Optimal Power Flow // FERC Technical conference to discuss opportunities for increasing real-time and day-ahead market efficiency through improved software. Docket N AD12-12-014, 2012.
10. Гвоздев Д.Б., Холопов С.С. Повышение эффективности работы оперативно-диспетчерского персонала путем создания централизованной системы управ- ления уровнями напряжения // Электричество. 2015. № 7. C. 4—11.
11. Kim T.K., Shin J.H., Kwak N.H. Voltage management system using hybrid voltage control to enhance voltage stability in Jeju power system // CIGRE 2010. Cекция С2.
12. Ilea V., Bovo C., Merlo M., Berizzi A. Reactive power flow optimization in power systems with hierarchical voltage control // Proc. 17th Power Systems Computation Conf. Stockholm (Sweden), 2011.
13. Corsi S., Martins N. Coordinated voltage control in transmission networks // Electra. 2007. N 2. P. 35—41.
14. Francos P., Verdugo S., Almesto С., Baeza D. Present and future reinforcements in the Spanish transmission grid allowing to control active and reactive power flows // CIGRE 2012. Секция С4.
Published
2018-12-21
Section
Power engineering (05.14.00)